
Vybe
Secure internal apps. Built by AI in seconds. Powered by your data.
Pre-Seed
Round
$1.5M raised · YC P25
3,000+
Pre-built integrations
Salesforce, Workday, Jira, Snowflake, Gmail
$264.4B
Low/no-code TAM by 2032
From $37.4B in 2025 · ~32% CAGR
Thesis
- 01
Internal tools are the dark matter of enterprise software. Every company has them; almost none are good. Retool is the loudest incumbent at $138.6M ARR and ~100 enterprise customers[3] — a rounding error against the latent demand. The market isn't unbuilt; it's unaddressed.
- 02
AI authoring crossed the line in 2025. Lovable shipped to $17M ARR in three months;[6] Cursor cleared $100M ARR in twelve;[4] v0 sits inside a $3.25B parent;[8] Bolt is at $40M ARR.[7] One-shot React from a prompt now works — but none of them are built for the workflows that actually run a business.
- 03
Security and data plug-ins are the moat. SSO, audit logs, RBAC, a 3,000-tool connector matrix, schema awareness, BYO-VPC. The boring work that enterprises pay for and that consumer-grade vibe-coding tools structurally don't ship. Anyone can fork a UI generator; only a team that does the connector work wins the enterprise.
- 04
The buyer changed. The function head — head of ops, finance, support — now holds the budget for internal apps. Vybe sells direct to them, collapsing the quarter-long IT prioritization queue to an afternoon. Engineering keeps the perimeter; the function head ships the tool.
Problem
Every fast-growing company drowns in the same swamp of glue work. And every existing option breaks in a different way.
Onboarding trackers, launch calendars, status bots, reconciliation queues, internal CRMs that diverged from Salesforce three quarters ago. The founders' own framing of the problem they lived inside Plato and Wealthfront: "each steals engineering time, rots when its owner leaves, and derails sprints."[12]
Today's options all break in different ways. Rigid SaaS doesn't bend to the workflow. Spreadsheets break the second the row count goes past 10k. Engineering builds it — and then quietly stops maintaining it. Retool and Airtable demand a builder with technical chops; the function head still files a ticket and waits. And the new wave of vibe-coders — Lovable, v0, Bolt — were built for consumer and indie apps. They don't ship SSO, they don't speak to Salesforce, and you can't point them at production Postgres.
Airplane.dev — well-funded, internal-tools-first — was acquired and sunset by Airtable in January 2024.[5] The cautionary tale is the same one Vybe is solving against: the category needed the AI authoring unlock to clear the value bar. That unlock arrived in 2025.
$138.6M
Retool ARR (2024)
~100 enterprise customers · $1.4M ACV
70%
New apps low-code by 2025
Gartner adoption forecast
~7×
Low/no-code TAM expansion
$37.4B (2025) → $264.4B (2032)
Retool 2024 revenue / customer figures[3] · Fortune Business Insights[1] · EY / Gartner adoption forecast[2]
Why Now
Code-gen became the killer LLM app. Connectors matured. The buyer changed.
Three trends converged in eighteen months: prompt-to-app crossed quality, integration ecosystems hit critical mass, and function heads quietly took control of the internal-tools budget.
Fast-growing teams drown in glue work — onboarding trackers, launch calendars, status bots, one-off scripts. Each steals engineering time, rots when its owner leaves, and derails sprints.

Vybe — Launch announcement[12]
Quang Hoang & Fabien Devos · P25 launch
It is literally one of the most mind-blowing tools anyone has seen here at UpKeep.
OC reference call[12]
300-person company · SVP Customer Success
This is the most beautiful UI I've seen in any agent builder.
OC reference call[12]
Founder · YC alum design partner
Three preconditions converged in the same eighteen months.
Code-gen became the killer LLM app. Cursor cleared $100M ARR in twelve months;[4] Lovable shipped to $17M ARR in three;[6] Bolt is at $40M ARR;[7] Windsurf was acquired by OpenAI in a $3B deal.[9] One-shot React from a prompt is now table stakes — the playbook works. The next move is choosing the surface where the AI authoring layer wins the next $100M.
Connector ecosystems matured. 3,000+ pre-built integrations are now a starting line, not a five-year roadmap. The connector matrix that took Zapier a decade to build is now an off-the-shelf platform primitive — which means Vybe's first day of development starts after the boring undifferentiated work that broke previous attempts.
Function heads control internal-tools budgets. Engineering's queue is full of revenue work. Ops, finance, and support buy directly when the AI authoring story is convincing enough — the same buyer pattern that took Notion, Linear, and Figma from individual seats to enterprise. Vybe is the first AI-native platform pointed at that exact buyer.
Fast-growing teams drown in glue work — onboarding trackers, launch calendars, status bots, one-off scripts. Each steals engineering time, rots when its owner leaves, and derails sprints.
How It Works
Three layers. One platform. A new internal app ships in an afternoon.
The shape of the product is compliance-first from day zero.
Model-agnostic and open-output. Vybe scaffolds standard NextJS — React on the front, NodeJS on the back. The generated app is real code, not a black-box template, which means engineering teams can read, fork, and audit what shipped. Deploy to Vercel, Cloudflare, your own infra, or BYO-VPC for the regulated cohort.
Schema-aware connectors. Vybe doesn't just pipe data — it tracks schema drift. When a Snowflake field renames or a Jira workflow changes, queries and UI regenerate automatically. The 80% of internal-tools maintenance cost ("the schema changed, the dashboard broke") becomes a background process, not a sprint.
Agents as a first-class citizen. Slack pings, reconciliations, status follow-ups, on-call escalations — the apps Vybe builds run autonomously between human reviews. The internal-app surface and the agent surface are the same product, not two separate purchases.[12]
Why Function Heads Buy
The function head is the buyer. Engineering is the partner, not the gate.
Most internal-tools demand never reaches engineering. It dies in a backlog or never gets filed because everyone knows it won't ship this quarter. Vybe is what each of those buyers actually wanted.
The wedge is the buyer, not the technology. Vybe routes around IT prioritization, not around governance.
The dead-letter demand. Excel sheets and Notion docs are the body count of internal-tools projects that engineering couldn't get to. The function head's path of least resistance has been to roll their own and live with the rot. Vybe gives them a real app, with the data plugged in, that their team can use tomorrow.
The bottom-up enterprise motion. Same buyer pattern that took Notion, Linear, and Figma from individual seats to enterprise. The function head ships one tool; the team adopts it; the SSO/RBAC/audit conversation happens with IT after the value is in production. Engineering doesn't fight it because Vybe takes work off their plate, not off their roadmap.
The pricing landing zone. Vybe's beta plan is $49/builder/mo + $9/end-user/mo with usage-based agent actions — aligned with Retool's seat bands[14] and well inside the function head's discretionary budget. The expansion path is the same one Retool walked: builder seats grow first; end-user seats follow; agents become the consumption SKU.
It is literally one of the most mind-blowing tools anyone has seen here at UpKeep.
Market
Every internal app at every company is the long tail. The AI authoring layer is the pull-forward.
Low-code and no-code platforms are the closest TAM proxy: $37.4B in 2025 to $264.4B by 2032 at ~32% CAGR.[1] Gartner has long forecast 70% of new apps will be low-code by 2025.[2] Both numbers were calibrated before the AI authoring layer arrived and likely understate the pull-forward.
Vybe's near-term ICP is the 50-to-5,000-FTE band: tech-savvy enough to have mature data infra, large enough to feel the internal-tools backlog, small enough to have a function-head buyer with budget authority. Roughly 120k orgs × ~$20k ACV ≈ $2.4B addressable inside that band alone — and Retool's $1.4M average ACV[3] hints at the upside as customers grow.
The internal-tools market isn't unbuilt — it's unaddressed. The first AI-native platform that combines prompt-to-app with the boring enterprise plumbing will eat a category that has paid Retool $138M a year just to be slightly less painful.
Competitive landscape
Four categories of competition. Vybe is positioned against all of them.
Each category has a structural limitation — UI legacy, buyer mismatch, or enterprise gap. Vybe's AI-native + connector-first + function-head-buyer stance is the answer to all three.
Retool is the most successful internal-tools company in history at $138M ARR. That's the floor of what's available when the AI authoring layer is missing and the buyer is engineering. The next category is built on prompts, sold to function heads, and runs against production data with the security perimeter intact.
Founder deep dive
A repeat YC operator who sold to Coda, paired with a former Director of Engineering at Wealthfront.
Founder & team
Risks & mitigations
What we're watching
References
- [1]Fortune Business Insights — Low-Code Development Platform Market ($37.4B in 2025 → $264.4B in 2032, ~32% CAGR)
- [2]EY — Low-code / no-code platforms and a culture of innovation (Gartner: 70% of new apps low-code by 2025)
- [3]GetLatka — Retool hit $138.6M ARR and ~100 enterprise customers in 2024
- [4]AIM Research — Anysphere's Cursor: fastest to reach $100M ARR in 12 months
- [5]Hacker News — The end of Airplane.dev (acquired and sunset by Airtable, Jan 2024)
- [6]Lovable — $15M Series A and $17M ARR in three months
- [7]Sacra — Bolt.new at $40M ARR
- [8]Vercel — Raises $250M Series E at $3.25B (parent of v0)
- [9]TechCrunch — Why OpenAI wanted to buy Cursor but opted for Windsurf ($3B deal)
- [10]Sacra — Replit hits $70M ARR growing 100% YoY
- [11]Coda — Coda acquires Plato (mentorship platform Quang Hoang co-founded as YC W16)
- [12]Y Combinator — Vybe launch ("Lovable for internal apps") and Vybe homepage testimonials
- [13]Y Combinator — Vybe company profile (P25)
- [14]Retool — Pricing (seat-based benchmark for AI-native internal apps)


